Archaeological Investigations of the Prestwould Slave Quarter, Mecklenburg County, Virginia (44MC534)

Patricia M. Samford

2001

Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Library Research Report Series - 0393
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Library

Williamsburg, Virginia

2009

Archaeological Investigations of the Prestwould Slave Quarter, Mecklenburg County, Virginia (44MC534)

Patricia M. Samford

Principal Investigator
Marley R. Brown III

Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Department of Archaeological Research

June 1992
Re-issued
April 2001

i

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Ed Chappell and Marley R. Brown, both of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, for providing the Department of Archaeological Research with the opportunity to do archaeology at Prestwould. The staff at Prestwould were wonderful — Julian Hudson, Edith Marks, Clifford Dodson, and building contractor Cecil Underwood all deserve special thanks for making it so easy to complete our work. The field crew, who labored in less than ideal weather conditions, were Greg Brown, Lu Gordon, Meredith Moodey, David Muraca and Sue Trevarthen.

Artifacts were processed in the laboratory at the Department of Archaeological Research. Special thanks are in order to Pegeen McLaughlin-Pullins for helping to coordinate this effort and to volunteers Tom Olds, Lewis Madson, and Jane Mary Gay for washing and numbering the artifacts. Other Colonial Williamsburg staff deserve thanks as well. Vanessa Patrick of the Department of Architectural Research compiled much of the information on house from primary documentation and Willie Graham and Jeff Bostetter, also of Architectural Research, provided needed information. Ann Smart Martin graciously provided me with results of her research on the Skipwith Papers. Gregory J. Brown edited and helped format this report.

iI
Page
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSi
LIST OF FIGURESiii
INTRODUCTION1
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND1
AFRICAN-AMERICANS AT PRESTWOULD4
FIELD AND LAB METHODS6
SLAVE QUARTER ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION8
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESULTS10
Research Design and Excavation Strategy10
Pier Supports11
Hearth Base12
Clay Platform14
Yard Use and Refuse Disposal17
Miscellaneous Artifacts17
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS18
BIBLIOGRAPHY22
APPENDICES
Appendix 1.Major Layer Descriptions25
Appendix 2.Context Record27
Appendix 3.State Site Form28
Appendix 4.Artifact Inventory29
iII
Page
1.Prestwould mansion house1
2.1798 plat of Prestwould plantation3
3.Prestwould slave quarter under restoration5
4.Location of archaeological test units6
5.Flow chart of soil layers7
6.Plantation and outbuildings plan view8
7.Elevation of the slave quarter9
8.Excavation at the quarter12
9.Groundhog disturbance under hearth13
10.Elevation of slave house showing clay platform14
11.Evidence of possible root cellars16
12.Pharmaceutical bottle18
13.Coin from the quarter18
14.Ceramics from the slave quarter19
1

Introduction

Prestwould is a late 18th-century plantation located on the Roanoke River in Mecklenburg County, Virginia. The property, owned by the Prestwould Foundation, contains many fine examples of late 18th- and early 19th-century outbuildings, in addition to an impressive two and a half story stone mansion house (Figure 1). As part of a long-term project to restore the property's house and grounds, the Prestwould Foundation initiated restoration of a standing late 18th-century slave quarter in late 1991. Beginning in December of that year and continuing into January of 1992, the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation's Department of Archaeological Research conducted exploratory excavations at the slave quarter in conjunction with this restoration. The aims of this project were to determine as much information as possible about the dating and construction of the building through a limited excavation. The following report will describe the findings of this project.

Historical Background

The original three-thousand-acre tract of land in Mecklenburg County forming Prestwould Plantation was acquired by Sir Peyton Skipwith in 1765 from William Byrd of Westover. Skipwith, appointed Justice of the Peace in Mecklenburg in 1769 (Executive Journals of the Council of Virginia VI), settled there by the late 1760s or early 1770s. Barring a brief period in the late 1770s, when he leased Hog Island in Surry County, Skipwith continued to live in Mecklenburg County, either at Prestwould or at nearby plantation Elm Hill.

RR039301 Figure 1. Prestwould mansion house.

2

In the late 18th century, Mecklenburg County was on the Virginia frontier and it was in this Piedmont region that an increasing number of Virginia plantersbegan to establish holdings. Unlike the Tidewater, available land was abundant, inexpensive and not depleted of its fertility from two centuries of tobacco crops. One well-known characteristic of Virginia colonial plantations was their self-sufficiency. Often located at considerable distances from nearby towns, plantations had to furnish all of the immediate needs of their residents. Travelers to the colonies often remarked that these plantations appeared to be small towns (Isaac 1982:35) and indeed this was often an apt description, particularly on the larger plantations. Prestwould, located on the Piedmont frontier miles from the closest town of Petersburg, was no exception. Like most plantations, Prestwould existed primarily as an agricultural enterprise; tobacco and corn were grown on its vast acreage, and sheep, pigs and cattle were raised and sold. A mill to grind corn and wheat and a blacksmith shop responsible for manufacturing and repairing tools, hardware and other farm equipment, were also located on the plantation. In addition to being a planter, Skipwith's account books show that he also served as a merchant to the local population. As was common practice among sizable planters in colonial Virginia, Skipwith maintained a small store on the plantation, where he sold imported goods to other county residents. His clients purchased mainly alcohol, fabric for slave clothing, and foodstuffs such as salt, sugar and molasses (Martin 1989). Skipwith's entrepreneurial activities were not limited to his store; he operated a ferry service, his blacksmith served the local community, he maintained a very profitable venture in breeding thoroughbred horses and also served as a banker by lending money through bonds and petty cash.

Extensive documentation for the Skipwith family, including the Skipwith Papers at Swem Library, the Virginia Gazette, and the Mecklenburg County Records, provide information about the establishment and growth of Prestwould Plantation. Although the present mansion was not built until the very end of the 18th century, there was extensive activity on the property prior to this time. Receipts for the purchase of mill stones are found dating as early as 1769, and by 1777 Skipwith's ferry had become known as a landmark (Patrick 1982).

It is also likely that an earlier dwelling house was constructed on the property. A 1798 plat of Prestwould shows the present mansion surrounded by quarters, outbuildings and shops, and the property is depicted as including a small island between the Staunton and the Dan Rivers, containing tobacco barns and slave quarters (Figure 2). What appears to be an earlier dwelling house is located to the southeast of the 1790s mansion, surrounded by a storehouse, granary, an "old" shop, and several unmarked buildings. This dwelling, which is depicted as a smaller version of the current mansion, may have served as the Skipwith home prior to the mansion's construction.

The construction of the present mansion use apparently began sometime in 1794. The Skipwith Papers contain numerous references to hiring slave masons between 1794 and 1797 and to ordering construction supplies such as window glass, paint and wallpaper from England in 1795. In a letter to stonemason Jacob Shelor, dated October 26, 1794, Sir Peyton Skipwith informed his builder that he wished no more work to be done that winter. At that point, the exterior walls of the house were described as "nearly done" (Skipwith Papers, Box VI, Folder 31).

3

RR039302 Figure 2. 1798 plat of Prestwould plantation.

Upon its completion, the Prestwould mansion would certainly have been one of the most impressive houses in the Piedmont. Constructed of native stone, the house sits imposingly on a high knoll overlooking the Roanoke River to the south. Its two-pile-deep floor plan included four heated corner rooms and two unheated central rooms on the first floor. An 1831 bill for wallpaper lists the names of these first floor rooms as a drawing room, dining room, hall, parlour, saloon and possibly a chamber (Skipwith Papers). The room designations, coupled with their decorative architectural detailing, suggests that they were used primarily as entertaining spaces.

An early 19th-century visitor's perception of Prestwould as a gentry plantation would have been influenced not only by its elaborate interior space, but also by the landscape around the house. An extensive formal garden was laid out on the northeast side of the house in 1801 (Chappell 1987b). Lady Jean Skipwith, Sir Peyton's second wife, is believed to have designed this garden, which contained parterres planted with flowers, vegetables, and fruit and nut trees. A greenhouse, whose ruins are still visible, was built in the northwest corner of the garden and an octagonal summer house constructed in the 19th century overlooks the garden and the river.

Skipwith continued to add to his acreage at Prestwould throughout the period from 1773 to 1793, so that at the time of his death in 1805, the plantation consisted of 4470 acres along both sides of the Dan River (Skipwith Papers, Box XXIV, Folder 3). Sir Peyton Skipwith ranked in the upper four to six percent of Mecklenburg County landholders during the last two decades of the 18th century, with only one other person in Mecklenburg County owning more land in 1805. An inventory completed after Skipwith's death showed his total estate as valued at approximately £20,000.

4

After 1805, the plantation continued to prosper under the direction of Skipwith's widow, Lady Jean. Upon her death in 1826, their son Humberston Skipwith inherited the property, leaving it to his son Fulwar when he died in 1863. The house and a portion of the property remained in the Skipwith family until 1946 (Oettinger n.d.), at which time the mansion and many of its furnishings were sold. In 1963, the house and forty-six acres of land surrounding it were purchased by the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities, and subsequently used as the headquarters of the Roanoke River Museum. Today the property is owned solely by the Prestwould Foundation, which was organized in 1956 as a non-profit local historical society.

African-Americans at Prestwould

Prestwould Plantation's primary documents and untapped archaeological resources are a potential gold mine of information about the African-Americans residing there in the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. This property survived and flourished in large part due to the labor of African-Americans, first as slaves, and later as tenant farmers. At Prestwould there exists the chance to study, through documents and archaeology, the progression from an enforced system of labor to one which, in many ways, was equally exploitative.

The Skipwith Papers contain numerous references to the slaves of Prestwould Plantation and their work. At the time of his death, Skipwith owned 235 slaves, a number which ranked him near the top slave owner for the county. In addition to those African-Americans who would have been general agricultural workers and domestic help, thirteen of the slaves were identified in the 1805 inventory by their trade. These included a mason, ferryman, cook, carpenter, and postilion. These slaves would have been housed on the plantation property, generally in groups or clusters of specially-constructed housing called quarters. A quarter complex contained housing for slave families, gardens, communal cooking or socializing areas, and usually a corncrib. Larger plantations, such as Prestwould, contained a number of quarters dispersed around the plantation: a home quarter, located close to the main house for the residence of slaves who worked in and around the house, and distant, or far, quarters, which were placed near the outlying fields and housed agricultural workers. The 1798 plat depicts five quarters (Horseshoe Quarters, Bluston Quarters, Brass's Quarter and two unnamed groups of buildings) spread along the north and south sides of the Staunton River. Skipwith's inventory also listed five quarters that were in existence in 1805: the Home Plantation, Brass's Quarter, Allen's Creek, the Forrest, and Isaac's Quarter.

In addition to containing what is believed to be the oldest standing slave quarter in Virginia (Figure 3), numerous other quarters and related slave spaces documented in the plantation records and other sources surely survive as archaeological resources. Unfortunately, any archaeological remnants of two quarter complexes and barns located on the island between the Staunton and Dan Rivers have now been submerged by the damming of the Roanoke River. With the rural nature of Prestwould and the surrounding countryside, however, it is highly probable that Bluston and Horseshoe Quarters survive to some extent as archaeological sites. It is also likely that some of the unmarked structures depicted on the plat could have also served as additional slave housing. Kitchens, laundries 5 RR039303 Figure 3. Prestwould slave quarter under restoration. and stables are some of the plantation's outbuildings which would have likely contained living spaces for slaves adjacent to their work areas.

Because the plantation continued to be occupied into the middle of the 20th century, this site contains archaeological remains relating to antebellum slavery and the lives of African-American tenant farmers from the Reconstruction through the Depression. On postbellum tenant plantations, freed African-Americans often continued to live in their former slave quarters or buildings constructed in much the same fashion. Interviews with former Prestwould residents document a slave cemetery and two log slave houses north of the property's periphery wall, near the current visitor parking lot (Chappell 1987). Although the construction date for these buildings is unknown, they were apparently similar in construction to the surviving quarter and, like it, were still occupied into the early 20th century. Many of the buildings at the plantation, such as the loom house, store and surviving slave house, were used as tenant dwellings after the Civil War and into the early 20th century. The surviving quarter and the loom house, for example, were refitted by Col. W.T. Hughes as tenant houses in the 1920s (Pace 1982).

Archaeological exploration around these and similar buildings has the potential for revealing information about Prestwould's African-American residents. The structural remains of buildings, or at least their footprints, would indicate the size, configuration and construction methods used in Prestwould slave housing. Artifacts recovered from around the quarters would indicate the dating and life span of these structures, as well as providing information on the daily lives, diet and work of the Prestwould slaves.

6

Field and Lab Methods

Given the relatively short time period set aside for the examination of the Prestwould slave quarter and the range of questions to be addressed, an excavation strategy had to be formulated to work with these constraints in mind. Archaeological excavation units were placed around the quarter, primarily in areas that were to be disturbed by the reconstruction and in places where it was hoped dating information would be revealed. The locations of these units are shown in Figure 4.

Soil was removed using shovels and trowels, with recent disturbances and topsoil layers usually shoveled out. The soil was removed in layers by unit, using color and textural changes to denote the various levels (Appendix 1). Soil color was determined using the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell 1975). Layers of soil and any features cutting through them were recorded using the standard procedure of Colonial Williamsburg's Department of Archaeological Research. This procedure involves assigning a unique number, known as a context number, to each individual stratum or feature within a test unit. This system facilitates stratigraphic interpretation using the "Harris Matrix" (Harris 1979) (Figure 5). Information about soil color, texture, inclusions, and stratigraphic position (Appendix 2) was recorded on a context record form. All soil was screened through ¼" wire mesh, to facilitate the recovery of small finds. Cultural material from each layer was retained, with the exception of brick and charcoal, whose presence was simply noted. All layers and RR039304 Figure 4. Location of archaeological test units. 7 RR039305 Figure 5. Flow chart of soil layers. features within excavation units were mapped in plan and features were bisected and mapped in profile after half their fill had been removed. Photographs of archaeological features and strata were taken as deemed necessary. A state archaeological site form for Prestwould Plantation was completed, and placed on file at the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (Appendix 3). An official state site number, 44MC534, was assigned to the entire plantation.

Processing of the artifacts recovered from the excavation of the Prestwould slave quarter was begun in January 1992 at the Department of Archaeological Research laboratory in Williamsburg. When artifacts were brought to the lab, they were accessioned according to the context number which they had been assigned in the field. After being washed, the artifacts were sorted into general types within groups and each ceramic and glass fragment was labeled with its state site and context number in India ink. Shell, faunal bone and metal artifacts were not labeled.

The next procedure was the preparation of an inventory of the artifacts and the assignment of a terminus post quem date for each group (Appendix 4). This date is established by identifying the artifact in each group for which the most recent documented date of manufacture is known. A terminus post quem or tpq date establishes the earliest date after which the layer or archaeological feature could have been deposited.

All artifacts from the Prestwould slave quarter are the property of Prestwould Plantation and have been returned there for curation. Notes, maps, and records generated during the excavation are on file at Prestwould and at the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Department of Archaeological Research.

8

Slave Quarter Architectural Information

The standing slave house at Prestwould once formed part of what would have once been the home quarter of the plantation, possible that shown on the 1798 plat as containing nine buildings. Traces of a similar dwelling, which fell into disrepair in the 1970s, are visible twenty feet to the north of the quarter. This building has not been examined archaeologically. Located approximately three hundred feet from the Prestwould mansion (Figure 6), this quarter complex may have housed the slaves who worked in the main house and yard. Charles Ball, an escaped slave from South Carolina stated that the quarters on his former plantation were located "about a quarter of a mile from the dwelling house" (Ball 1837:139) and other early 19th-century slave accounts commented on quarters placed close enough to be within calling distance of the main house (Rawick 1977:179).

The standing building, a frame duplex resting on stone piers, had been constructed in two stages (Figure 7). The eastern portion, measuring 12' × 16', is believed to have been built in the late 18th century. Constructed with handwrought nails, the dwelling contained one room with an end chimney and a riven clapboard exterior. Two doors, one each in the north and south walls, were original to the first period portion of the quarter, as was a small window placed to the west of the south wall door (Graham 1991). Although it would be inadequate as standard housing by modern perceptions, the Prestwould quarter was standard for 18th-century slave dwellings. The majority of slave houses, as well as those of lower class Anglo-Americans during this period, were such poorly-built one-room log structures with dirt floors and sleeping and storage space above the rafters. Given its small size and lack of good interior light, much of the family's daily activities would have likely been conducted outside whenever possible.

Archaeological, photographic and other written evidence suggests that African-American housing generally changed very little during the 19th and into the 20th centuries. The RR039306 Figure 6. Plantation and outbuildings plan view. 9 RR039307 Figure 7. Elevation of the slave quarter. Prestwould cabin also conforms with 19th-century descriptions of quarters throughout the South, such as this one by Vinnie Rusby of Mississippi:

The cabins we lived in was built of logs split open and pegged together…. The cabins didn't have but about one window and two doors. One door at the front and one at the back (Rawick 1977:309).

Sometime around 1820, an addition was constructed at the western end of the building, more than doubling its size to 42' × 12' so then the structure could accommodate two families. Although the form and general character of the new section did not change, the framing for the second period addition was much more substantial than that of the first period section, with architectural detailing characteristic of early 19th-century houses (Chappell 1991). Cut nails, common after circa 1805, were used in the new construction and at least two windows on the south wall were glazed (Graham 1991). An interior stone and brick hearth, constructed at the time of the addition, served both sides of the duplex and a wooden floor was added on both sides of the building. With the construction of the addition and some of its detailing, the cabin took on more of an appearance of what 19th-century agricultural journals were considered ideal slave housing. One of these journals stated

Houses for negroes should be elevated at least two feet above the earth, with good plank flooring, weather proof, and with capacious windows and doors for ventilation, a large fireplace, and wood convenient…. One sixteen or eighteen feet square is not too large for a man and a woman and three or four small children (quoted in McKee 1989).

As with any structure which continues in use for extended periods, the Prestwould quarter experienced structural modifications. It is likely that the original house faced north, 10 along the present lane. Architectural analysis of the building's framing suggests that this orientation was changed sometime in the 19th century, when two large second period doorways were cut into the south wall of the building (Chappell 1991) and new windows were placed between the chimney and doors. The slave quarter was rehabilitated in the early 20th century and used as tenant housing (Pace 1982; Chappell 1986:32). At this time, the windows were enlarged, sheathing was added to the building interior, and a ladder stair was added for access to the attic space (Chappell 1986:33). Although there is no evidence of an interior door between the two rooms, it is possible that the partition wall south of the chimney was knocked out, joining the two halves of the building. An early 20th-century French fashion plate, tacked to framing joists within the western half of the quarter, is a remnant of this tenancy period. The building was occupied into the 1940s or early 1950s and then used for storage.

Archaeological Results

Research Design and Excavation Strategy

The archaeological work which took place at the Prestwould slave quarter fell into several basic categories. Most of the work was driven by the need to salvage archaeological information prior to any ground disturbance associated with the building restoration. This archaeology was to include excavation around the stone piers and the chimney base. Other segments of the project were driven by more basic research priorities, such as attempting to determine the nature and dating of the clay pad under the eastern section of the quarter, whether storage pits known as root cellars existed under the structure, and how the yard space outside the quarter was used.

As part of the restoration effort, fourteen stone piers were scheduled to be removed and later replaced with substantial concrete footings supporting the reconstructed piers. Before digging to set the concrete footings began, test units were excavated around eight of the fourteen pier locations (see Figure 4). The primary purpose of excavating these units was to salvage any information from intact soil strata which would be destroyed by the seating of the footings. While the work was salvage in nature, it was also hoped that archaeological excavation would answer architectural questions about the building. While it was clear from architectural analysis that the building was constructed in two stages, it was hoped that excavation would provide better dating for the two sections of the building.

Additionally, the remaining hearth stones were removed from the quarter's central chimney in preparation for its reconstruction. The configuration of these stones was noted and soil layers around and under them were excavated and examined. This excavation would possibly provide information on the presence and physical appearance of a fireplace associated with the first period of building construction.

Several test units were excavated in areas not be to affected by restoration. These units were dug solely in an attempt to answer questions about the quarter. Two test units were placed under the slave quarter floor, one each on the east and west sides of the duplex. These units would potentially provide information on the disposal of debris under the cabins, particularly under the western half of the building. Additionally, the function and date of the thick clay pad present under 11 the eastern portion of the quarter was sought, as well as the presence or absence of root cellars cutting through the clay. Yard use and garbage disposal practices were also to be tested through the placement of several small excavation units around the standing quarter.

The results of the excavation will be discussed below.

Pier Supports

The wooden framing of the slave quarter rested on fourteen stone piers placed at regular intervals under the building. Since the structure was located on a slight slope, the height of these piers varied from the eastern, or uphill, to the western end of the quarter. At its western end, the quarter was raised to a height of approximately four feet above the ground surface. Excavation units were placed at the locations of eight of these fourteen piers (Units A-D, F-J) in an attempt to recover construction, dating and artifactual information (see Figure 4).

Perhaps the most relevant information revealed through the excavation of these units was provided by a fragment of a refined English earthenware. This sherd of whiteware, a ceramic which began production in 1820 (Pittman 1990), was found in a thin washed layer of soil underlying the stone pier at the building's southeast corner. The presence of this ceramic fragment under a pier on the late 18th-century section of the building suggests two possibilities: 1) this pier was rebuilt as underpinning under the standing quarter sometime after 1820, or 2) the quarter did not stand in this location until sometime after the first quarter of the 19th century. Since the eastern portion of the quarter is believed to have been built in the late 18th century, this latter conclusion would suggest that the building (at least the eastern portion) was moved to its present site from another location. Since there are numerous accounts of moving buildings in the 18th and 19th centuries, this is entirely feasible. Although architectural analysis of the building shows no firm evidence that it had been moved onto the present site from another location, the building could have been moved intact (Chappell 1991b). Indeed, additional evidence discussed in upcoming pages supports the theory that the building in fact was moved to its present location.

It was hoped that excavation around the quarter would provide a sample of artifacts discarded during the building's two-hundred-year lifespan (Figure 8). Archaeological excavations commonly yield evidence of widespread accumulations of ceramics, glass, nails, food bone and other debris surrounding structures on colonial and 19th-century sites. Artifacts accumulate in discrete soil layers which gradually build up through time, so it was expected that the quarter excavation would yield stratified soil layers, which, with their artifacts, could be separated by time period and attributed to the building's various occupants.

Disappointingly, the effects of erosion and other activities around the quarter disturbed stratified soil layers. Soil accumulation was minimal (5 to 7 cm) around the eastern and northern sections of the building. This lack of intact soil can be explained most readily as the result of erosion, given present topography. Only one soil layer was found, containing 12 RR039308 Figure 8. Excavation at the quarter. a mixture of ceramics and glass dating primarily from the second half of the 19th century. At the western, or downslope, end of the quarter, however, soil accumulation was much greater, reaching a depth of 24 centimeters overlying sterile subsoil. The much thicker deposit of soil there may be partially accounted for by the buildup of soil eroding from uphill and accumulating around the piers at the opposite end of the building. The soil excavated around the western end of the building also contained ceramics and glass dating largely to the second half of the 19th century. Although some 18th-century ceramics were included in the layers, there were no soil strata present there (or anywhere else on the site) whose deposition could be definitely dated to the 18th century.

Another possible explanation for the lack of soil and for the relatively few artifacts found in the yard layer may be the practice of yard sweeping. Sweeping the dirt yard around the quarter, a common practice into the 20th century, would affect patterning of artifacts, as well as the accumulation of soil around the house. Research on tenant farm houses in Texas has shown that the number of artifacts increase as distance from the house increases, as a result of yard sweeping (Moir 1982).

Hearth Base

The slave quarter contained a central stone and brick hearth, believed to have been constructed when the western portion was added to the slave quarter. When the archaeological project began in late 1991, most of the hearth had already been disassembled, with only a few layers of the chimney base stone remaining below the floor level of the quarter. In order to accurately reconstruct the hearth, the remaining stones were mapped, numbered, 13 and removed by a stonemason. The stones, some of which were bonded with clay mortar, and their placement were examined by archaeologists during removal in order to document any traces of an earlier hearth remaining intact.

When the archaeological project began, all that remained of the chimney and hearth was a solid layer of shaped natural stone, level with the wooden floor of the quarter. Removal of these stones revealed that beneath this level the construction method of the hearth base changed. Instead of a solid stone hearth base, an outer wall of stone forming the exterior limits of the hearth had been infilled with loose soil and mixed stone. This soil consisted of a very dry brown silt, mixed with pinkish and grey ash, which had sifted between the stones of the firebox during the building's use as a dwelling. This soil was excavated and carefully screened as the stones were removed. Contained within this layer were fragments of an undecorated iron fireback. Excavation ceased at the top of a layer of redeposited clay forming the base of the chimney, extending under the eastern half of the quarter. No traces of an earlier chimney base remained below the second period hearth base. If there had been an earlier hearth, any remnants had apparently been completely destroyed during the new hearth construction. Additionally, the area under the second period hearth had been extensively tunneled by groundhogs in the second half of the twentieth century (Figure 9), creating even more disturbance.

The dryness of the soil within the chimney base allowed remarkable preservation of animal bone and ethnobotanical materials, such as seeds and nuts. At first, it was believed that these materials had made their way below the hearth during food preparation in the quarter. Like the ash mixed in with the loose soil, these bones and seeds, all of which were very small, could have fallen through gaps between the hearthstones into the soil fill below. RR039309 Figure 9. Groundhog disturbance under hearth. 14 Unfortunately, tunneling through and under the chimney base by groundhogs had caused extensive disturbance in this area and many modern artifacts were mixed with the 19th-century ceramics found in the soil under the chimney base. Scraps of newspaper dating from the 1950s and 1960s, doubtless carried in by the rodents, as well as plastic beads and other similar artifacts, led to the conclusion that the soil recovered from within the hearth base had been too disturbed for artifacts under the hearth to be meaningfully analyzed. Generally, archaeologists can distinguish areas disturbed by rodents and remove these areas separately, but in this instance, the dry, loose soil destroyed all traces of stratigraphic boundaries. It was only after all of the loose soil had been removed that the extent of the groundhog tunneling, as it cut through the clay chimney base, became evident.

This was extremely disappointing, since a sealed soil deposit containing such quantities of small bones, seeds, and other botanical material would have provided excellent evidence of the diet of 19th-century slaves and tenant farmers. Since many of the seeds and bones showed signs of rodent gnawing, however, it was virtually impossible to separate materials brought in by the rodents and any which had found their way below the hearth base through the occupants' cooking activities.

Clay Platform

The eastern, or older, portion of the quarter was underlain by a thick (54 cm) pad of redeposited yellowish-red sandy clay (Figure 10). Only one other similar clay platform has been recorded in this region — this one under an early 19th-century pier-supported RR039310 Figure 10. Elevation of slave house showing clay platform. 15 slave house in Anne Arundel County, Maryland (Chappell, pers. comm.). Although it was once suspected that this platform represented sterile clay subsoil from around which the surrounding land had eroded, excavation proved that it had been deliberately built up under the quarter for an unknown purpose. It was hoped that excavation could indicate why this platform was built.

There could have been several potential reasons for the construction of this feature. It could have been used to create a level dirt floor under the structure, which was set on a gentle slope leading towards a ravine to the west. Packed clay floors were not unknown in 18th-century Virginia outbuildings. For example, both the Brush-Everard and the Archibald Blair kitchens in Williamsburg contained clay floors (Samford 1990). Each of these buildings, however, was constructed with a continuous brick foundation and the clay floors contained within these foundations. If the clay under the Prestwould quarter had served as a floor for the first period building, it would have been exposed to downslope erosion from rain, requiring constant maintenance around the edges of the building. There was no archaeological evidence of this type of maintenance. Additionally, in terms of weather- or animal-proofing the house, this would have been an inadequate choice for a floor, offering little protection from insects, snakes or the cold wind. Perhaps the most compelling reason against the floor hypothesis, however, is provided by architectural analysis, which indicates that the building always contained a wooden floor.

Another potential reason for the construction of the clay pad could have been as insulation for the open space between the ground surface and the raised wooden floor of the quarter. In addition to blocking some air flow under the cabin, this clay would have also served as a barrier to animals crawling under the house and to the disposal of garbage directly under the quarter (McKee 1989).

A final possible reason for the clay pad would have been to create a raised bed below the floor joists, perhaps to contain storage pits or root cellars. A fairly common feature on Virginia slave sites has been the presence of rectangular pits cut into the floors of slave quarters (Kelso 1984; Samford 1988). Although most quarters with root cellars contain only one or two of these pits, numbers of root cellars within buildings vary. As many as eighteen cellars were located within the foundation walls of one slave house at Kingsmill Plantation (Kelso 1984). These cellars appeared to have served a number of functions— for storage of food and personal possessions in the often-cramped confines of the quarters, as hiding places for stolen goods or valued items, and finally as a place to dispose of garbage. The content of root cellars excavated on Virginia slave sites has provided invaluable information on slave life. Although some wood- or brick-lined cellars have been found (Kelso 1971, 1984; Samford 1990), most cellars were cut directly into clay subsoil, unlined and protected from erosion by the structures above them.

It was thought possible that a clay subfloor had been built under the eastern section of the quarter in order to create a base through which to cut root cellars. During the quarter restoration, some later period flooring in the eastern portion of the building was removed to allow examination of the clay pad. Cleaning the surface of the clay revealed what are possibly the traces of two root cellars cutting through the clay pad (Figure 11). One of these features, cut by a groundhog tunnel, contained a black ashy loam soil, while the 16 RR039311 Figure 11. Evidence of possible root cellars. second was filled with black ash and burned clay. Unfortunately, the limited amount of flooring that could be removed and time constraints of this project did not allow a positive identification.

Two layers of soil overlying the clay platform would need to be removed before the extent of these possible features could be determined. They included a thick layer of loose soil which sifted between the floorboards and accumulated on the clay during the building's lifetime, as well as a thin (0.5 cm) layer of brown sandy clay which may date to the building's earliest years of occupation.

In addition to determining the function of the clay pad, it was hoped that archaeology could date its construction. In an attempt to recover artifacts that would help date when the clay pad was laid down, several archaeological test units were positioned so that they cut through the clay along the north end of the building. Although the excavation of this redeposited clay did not yield many artifacts, one of the few artifacts that was found provided a tpq, or date after which, the pad had been built. This artifact, the fragment of whiteware discussed earlier, began production after 1820 (Pittman 1990). In addition to being contained within the clay, this ceramic sherd was also located under the stones of the southeastern stone pier. It thus appears that the clay platform was built after that date and the older portion of the quarter moved on top of it. The only other artifacts found in the clay were a fragment of window glass and a sherd of pearlware, another English earthenware, first manufactured after 1779 (Pittman 1990).

Soil strata within the excavation units on the north end of the quarter revealed that a thin layer of clay slightly extended out from the building to the east and north. This washed layer of clay around the eastern portion of the building was probably created as a result of erosion along the edges of the clay pad.

17

Yard Use and Refuse Disposal

A 50-by-50-cm unit (K) was placed under the center of the western half of the quarter in order to determine whether trash was being discarded under the building (Figure 4). Antebellum agricultural journals warned of the unhealthiness of garbage accumulations around and under quarters (McKee 1989). Soil accumulation under the quarter was minimal (10 cm) and only a few artifacts, which included fragments of late 19th-century container and lamp chimney glass, were recovered. This suggests that there was only incidental, not deliberate, disposal of garbage under the building.

Two units (E and L) were placed in the south yard of the quarter in an attempt to determine how this area was used when the building was occupied. There, a 9 cm layer of topsoil sealed a thick 12 cm stratum of brown sandy clay with inclusions of charcoal and brick bits. The brown sandy clay contained numerous artifacts dating largely from the 19th and early 20th century, although there were several fragments of 18th-century wine bottle glass and German stoneware as well. The appearance and thickness of the soil layer, combined with the mixing of artifacts from different time periods, are typical of soils which have been plowed. It is possible that the area to the south of the quarter was used as a garden in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Since apparently very few artifacts were being discarded around the building, two shovel test units were placed to the west at distances of fifteen and thirty meters from the quarter. These test pits, measuring 25 centimeters in diameter, were excavated down the slope of the ravine, in an area where it was believed most likely that garbage would have been discarded from the house. Although 15 centimeters of loamy soil fill was found overlying sterile clay, no artifacts were recovered from either unit. This suggests that either trash disposal took place to the north or south of the quarter in areas not examined, or that trash was purposely removed from the site. Because a number of displaced artifacts would be expected if yard refuse was eroded from this area, the lack of artifacts also suggests that erosion was probably not mainly responsible for the lack of soil and artifacts around the quarter.

Miscellaneous Artifacts

Numerous unprovenienced artifacts were found by the Underwood contractors as they worked around the quarter. Some of the artifacts were surface finds apparently recovered under the western section of the quarter, while others were removed from the ground during the 1987 placement of stabilizing timbers around the building. Although a few fragments of ceramics and glass dating to the late 18th century were included with these finds, the large majority were manufactured after the second half of the 19th century. Nothing extraordinary was found; the artifacts were primarily those that one would expect to see around a house occupied during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Glass made up the largest category of finds, and included fragments of canning jars, milk bottles, table glass and pharmaceutical bottles. Ceramics included inexpensive hotel wares and transfer printed tablewares in the common Blue Willow pattern. One unbroken Phenolax Wafers medicine bottle (Figure 12), dating to the late 19th or early 20th century, was found between the interior and exterior wall sheathing of the quarter. It is interesting to speculate on how this 18 bottle had come to rest there and tempting to want to tie it with African-American religious beliefs or magic practices.

Perhaps the most important artifact discovered during the restoration, at least from an architectural standpoint, was a crudely made strap hinge and pintle which had probably been used at the quarter. It is believed that this architectural hardware dates to the 18th century and was consequently used as a pattern for some of the architectural hardware at the reconstructed Carter's Grove slave quarters in Williamsburg (Graham 1987; Chappell pers. comm.).

Two coins were found during the restoration of the property (Figure 13). One, a copper alloy one-cent piece minted in 1820, was found under the western end of the quarter. The second coin, a 1773 Virginia halfpenny, was found on the top framing member of a second period door on the south wall of the western part of the quarter.

Discussion and Recommendations

As sometimes seems to be the case, archaeology generated more questions than it answered at the Prestwould quarter. Unfortunately, recent disturbances and other activities around the building prevented any definite conclusions from being formed about the dating of the slave quarter, although some tantalizing clues were revealed. The biggest mystery that has been raised is whether the eastern, or older, portion of the quarter was moved to its present location sometime in the second or third quarter of the 19th century. Several lines of evidence suggest this is likely. The most important clue is the fragment of post-1820 earthenware found under one of the older section's stone piers. While this may simply indicate that the pier was rebuilt after 1820, additional evidence suggests otherwise. The lack of late 18th- and early 19th-century artifacts in the soil around the quarter lends support to the theory that the eastern portion of the building was moved to its present location immediately prior to the construction of the western addition sometime after 1820. RR039312 Figure 12. Pharmaceutical bottle. RR039313 Figure 13. Coin from the quarter. 19 RR039314 Figure 14. Ceramics from the slave quarter. Of all the ceramic fragments (68) found in the units around the slave quarter exterior, 77% of them began manufacture after 1820 (Figure 14).

This lack of pre-1820 ceramics could suggest several possibilities:

  • that the slaves living there in the 18th century had no access to durable consumer goods;
  • that the artifacts dating from this time period were deliberately removed from the site; or
  • that the slave quarter was not standing in this location in the late 18th and early 19th century.

It is not likely that the scarcity of debris could be accounted for by the slaves' lack of access to material goods. Excavations on 18th- and 19th-century Virginia slave sites have recovered a wide variety of ceramic, glass and metal items owned, used and discarded by slaves. The second and third options are much more likely. It is possible that the garbage was removed or swept from around the house before the 1820s, given the lack of yard refuse and soil present in the yard, and that disposal or sweeping practices changed once the western half of the building was constructed. However, it is more likely that the eastern portion of the quarter was moved to its present location after 1820 and then enlarged.

In addition to explaining the lack of early ceramics, glass and other materials, this hypothesis would also account for the lack of earlier hearth remains under the present 20 fireplace. Perhaps larger-scale excavation around the quarter might provide further and more conclusive evidence of whether a portion of the building was moved onto the lot. Dendrochronological analysis of the framing timbers of both sections of the duplex would at least provide conclusive dating evidence on the two phases of building construction.

Although no conclusive dating evidence was discovered for the building construction, numerous artifacts dating to the postbellum tenancy period were recovered. The artifacts were generally typical of the items you might expect a late 19th-/early 20th-century tenant farmer to own: some inexpensive ceramics, glass bottles and jars for milk, beverages, food and patent medicine, food bone, and clothing-related items such as buttons and beads. Lamp chimney glass fragments were evidence of the light source in a household with no electricity. Ceramics in a wide variety of types and patterns were found, suggesting that dishes were purchased not as sets, but as replacements for individual broken vessels. This agrees with 19th-century archaeological evidence and store ledgers from Waverley Plantation (Orser 1988:134) and with Agee and Evans' (1941) description of unmatched plates, saucers and glasses in a tenant farm house. These artifacts, and even the house itself, show the lifestyle of Prestwould's tenant farmers was a meager and hard one. Typically, descriptions of early 20th-century tenant farm houses suggest that their furnishings were neither expensive nor abundant (Agee and Evans 1941; Schuyler 1938). It is also relevant that "freed slaves' memories of the house furnishings they had as slaves were remarkably similar" to those after Emancipation (Orser 1988:121), suggesting that the quality of material life changed little from slavery to freedom.

Future potential for archaeological research on African-Americans at Prestwould Plantation is promising. The 1798 plat shows nine buildings located in the vicinity of the standing slave quarter. Although the standing quarter and the ruins of another to its north are the only possible visible traces of these buildings, an inspection of the surrounding topography may offer some clues about additional structures. The quarters were constructed on the gentle slope of a ravine. Observation of the slope shows flat areas where clay pads may have once existed under now-defunct quarters. These possible clay platforms were not as clearly defined as that under the standing structure, which could be explained by the years of being exposed to the weather. Archaeological trenching across these possible clay platforms should confirm or refute this hypothesis. The possible root cellar features under the eastern section of the standing quarter should also be examined. If they are root cellars, excavation of these features would provide artifacts from sealed and possibly tightly-datable contexts. It is also possible that the features were created, used and filled during the first half of the 19th century and would provide evidence of slave life at this time.

Archaeological survey could also locate outlying quarters shown on the 1798 plat and listed in the 1805 inventory, as well as undocumented ones. Quarters which were built, occupied and destroyed within a short time span (twenty to thirty years) would provide the most information about housing and material culture of their occupants. Locating and excavating a range of these buildings on the plantation would show any changes which occurred through time. Additionally, archaeological information from outlying quarters for field workers could be compared with that from quarters which house skilled craftsmen and slaves who worked in the mansion. Differences in access to consumer goods could be tested in this fashion.

21

Since Prestwould is documented as having 18th- and 19th-century slave quarters, as well as late 19th- and early 20th-century African-American tenant farm homes, this property also provides an ideal opportunity for studying what changes occurred in the lives of African-Americans after the Civil War and how they adjusted to their lives as free people. It is likely that many of the families who were slaves on the property continued to live there as tenant farmers after the war. Following the same families archaeologically from slavery to freedom would provide an excellent opportunity for charting change.

22

Bibliography

Agee, James and Walker Evans
1941
Now Let Us Praise Famous Men: Three Tenant Families. Boston: Houghton
Ball, Charles
1837
Slavery in the United States: A Narrative of the Life and Adventures of Charles Ball, A Black Man. New York: John S. Taylor.
Chappell, Edward
1987a
Memo to Files dated February 18, 1987 on Prestwould, Mecklenburg County, Virginia. On file at the Foundation Library, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
1987b
Memo to Files dated February 26, 1987 on the Gardens and Conservatory at Prestwould Plantation. On file at the Foundation Library, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
1986
Architectural Recording and the Open-Air Museum: A View from the Field. In Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture II, edited by Camille Wells, pp. 24-36. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.
1991a
Quick Notes on Slave Housing, etc. at Prestwould, Mecklenburg County, Virginia, August 22-23, 1991. On file at the Foundation Library, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
1991b
Prestwould Slave House, Mecklenburg County, Virginia. Notes dated December 18, 1991. On file at the Foundation Library, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Council of Colonial Virginia
Executive Journals of the Council of Colonial Virginia.
Graham, William
1987
Strap Hinge, Prestwould Slave Quarter. Memo dated July 1, 1987 on file at the Foundation Library, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
1991
Prestwould Slave House, Mecklenburg County, Virginia. Dated August 23, 1991. On file at the Foundation Library, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Harris, Edward C.
1979
Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. Academic Press, London.
Isaacs, Rhys
1982
The Transformation of Virginia 1740-1790. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Kelso, William
1971
A Report on Exploratory Excavations at Carter's Grove Plantation, James City County, Virginia (June 1970-September 1971). Unpublished report on file at the Department of Archaeological Research, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. 23
Kelso, William
1984
Kingsmill Plantations, 1619-1800; Archaeology of Country Life in Colonial Virginia. Academic Press, New York.
McKee, Larry
1989
Virginia Slave Cabins: Documented Intentions Versus Archaeological Realities. Paper presented at the 1989 Society for Historical Archaeology Meeting.
Martin, Ann Smart
1989
The Account Books of Sir Peyton Skipwith: A Brief Consideration of Their Contents. Report submitted to the Skipwith Papers Project for Prestwould Plantation.
Moir, Randall W.
1982
Sheet Refuse: An Indicator of Past Lifeways: In Settlement of the Prairie Margin: Archaeology of the Richland Creek Reservoir: Navarro and Freestone Counties, Texas, 1980-1981, A Research Synopsis, edited by L. Mark Raab, pp. 139-152. Dallas: Southern Methodist University, Archaeology Research Program.
Munsell
1975
Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth/Kollmorgen Corporation, Baltimore.
Oettinger, Mrs. F. N.
n.d.
A History of Prestwould. On file at the Foundation Library, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Orser, Charles E. Jr.
1988
The Material Basis of the Postbellum Tenant Plantation; Historical Archaeology in the South Carolina Piedmont. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
Pace, Georgia
1982
Interview at Prestwould Plantation, March 5, 1982. On file at the Foundation Library, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Patrick, Vanessa
1982
Prestwould Archival Research. Memo to Edward A. Chappell dated April 19, 1982, contained in the Prestwould File, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Library, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Pittman, William
n.d.
Lab Manual. On file at the Department of Archaeological Research, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Rawick, George L. (ed.)
1977
The American Slave: A Composite Autobiography. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood. 24
Samford, Patricia
1988
Memo to Cary Carson concerning the Carter's Grove Slave Quarters. Memo on file, Department of Archaeological Research, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.
Samford, Patricia
1990
"Near the Governor's": Patterns of Development of Three Properties Along Williamsburg's Palace and Nicholson Streets in the 18th Century. M.A. Thesis, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
Schuler, E. A.
1938
Social Status and Farm Tenure: Attitudes and Social Conditions of Corn Belt and Cotton Belt Farmers. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Security Administration, and the Bureau of Agricultural Economics, Social Research Report No. 4. Washington: Government Printing Office.
Skipwith Papers
n.d.
Special Collections, Earl Gregg Swem Library. College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.
25

Appendix 1.
Major Layer Descriptions

  • 1. Topsoil (Layer 1)
    Contexts—44MC534-1, 2, 3, 4, 14, 17, 25, 27, 36
    Terminus Post Quem—1880
    A dark grey brown (Munsell Color 10YR5/2) sandy clay. Ranges from 5 to 7 cm thick.
  • 2. Clay Pad (Layer 2)
    Contexts—44MC534-5, 11, 19, 29
    Terminus Post Quem—1820
    Redeposited orange sandy clay subsoil (5YR5/8). This 54-cm-thick clay pad exists under the eastern half of the slave quarter.
  • 3. Grey Silty Clay (Layers 3 and 11)
    Contexts—44MC534-6, 7, 8, 10, 16, 18, 30, 37
    Terminus Post Quem—1880
    A layer of grey silty clay (10YR4/2). This layer is consistent throughout the entire site.
  • 4. Orangish Grey Clayey Loam (Layer 4)
    Contexts—44MC534-13, 21, 32
    Terminus Post Quem—1864
    An arbitrary continuation of Layer 3, consisting of a grey (7.5YR3/4) clayey loam, picking up hints of orange subsoil clay as the layer deepens. Sparse brick and heavy charcoal flecking included in this 5 cm thick layer.
  • 5. Orange and Grey Clayey Loam (Layer 5) Contexts—44MC534-20, 24
    Terminus Post Quem—1864
    An arbitrary continuation of Layers 3 and 4, consisting of an orangish (7.5YR4/4) clayey loam with extensive grey clayey loam mottling. Layer contains heavy charcoal flecking.
  • 6. Subsoil (Layer 6)
    Contexts—44MC534-22, 23, 38, 39
    Terminus Post Quem—no date available
    Orange clay subsoil (5YR5/8). Not excavated.
  • 26
  • 7. Stone Outcropping (Layer 9)
    Contexts—44MC534-15
    Terminus Post Quem—no date available
    The test unit at the southeastern corner of the quarter contained a natural outcropping of stone, possibly schist, under the clay pad of the slave house. Samples of this stone were retained.
27

Appendix 2.
Context Record

* Not included in this document.

28

Appendix 3. State Site Form

* Because it shows the exact site location, the state site inventory record is not included in this public document.

29

Appendix 4.
Artifact Inventory

Note: Inventory is printed from the Re:discovery cataloguing program used by Colonial Williamsburg, manufactured and sold by Re:discovery Software, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Brief explanation of terms:

  • Context No. Arbitrary designation for a particular deposit (layer or feature), consisting of a four-digit "site/area" designation and a five-digit context designation. The site/area for this project is "76AA."
  • TPQ "Date after which" the layer or feature was deposited, based on the artifact with the latest initial manufacture date. Deposits without a diagnostic artifact have the designation "NDA," or no date available.
  • Listing The individual artifact listing includes the catalog "line designation," followed by the number of fragments or pieces, followed by the description.

30
Context No.: 76AA-00000 TPQ: 1864
AA1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER
AB1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AC2REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLUE
AE1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AF3GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AG1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINE BOTTLE
Context No.: 76AA-00001 TPQ: 1864
AA1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AB1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AC1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AD1GLASS, FRAGMENT, MIRROR
AE1MORTAR, MORTAR, SHELL
AF1STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD, QUARTZITE
Context No.: 76AA-00002 TPQ: 1864
AA1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AB1IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, CUT
AC3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AD3IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AE6GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN, MODERN IN APPEARANCE
AF4GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AG3GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AH1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
Context No.: 76AA-00003 TPQ: 1880
AA2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AB2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AC1IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AD1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AE3GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AF1GLASS, MANG SOLARIZED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AG1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, WHITE
AH1GLASS, MANG SOLARIZED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, LIPPING TOOL, FINISH
Context No.: 76AA-00004 TPQ: NDA
AB1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AC1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN, MODERN
AD2BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
Context No.: 76AA-00005 TPQ: 1779
AA1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED, *
Context No.: 76AA-00007 TPQ: 1864
AA2IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, WIRE
AB2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AC3IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, CUT
AD3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AE1IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AF4IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AG4IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
31
AI1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AJ1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AK2GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AL1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, CONTIN THREAD
AM1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, SHELL EDGE, BLUE
AN5IRON, STAPLE
AO1IRON, BUCKLE
AP1PORCELAIN, BUTTON, ONE PIECE
AQ1MORTAR, MORTAR, SHELL
AR2STONE, STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD
AS1ZINC, METAL CAP/LID
AT1OTHER ORGANIC, STORAGE BATTERY, GRAPHITE D-CELL SIZE
Context No.: 76AA-00008 TPQ: 1864
AA4IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AB1IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, CUT
AC2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AD2IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, WIRE
AE5IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AF4IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AG6GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AH1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AI1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, BROWN
AJ1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AK1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AL1BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
AM1IRON, STAPLE
Context No.: 76AA-00010 TPQ: 1864
AB1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AC1IRON, NAIL, OVER 4 IN, CUT
AD1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AE1IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AF5GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTIN THREAD, WHITE
AG14GLASS, WINDOW GLASS
AH8GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AI1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN, LETTERING/NUMB, '..RF'*
AJ2GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER
AK2REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AL14GLASS, WINDOW GLASS
AL2REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, DECALCOMANIA, POLYCHROME, *
AM2REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AN1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED FLOW, BLUE
AO1IRON, UNID HARDWARE
AP1STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD, GRANITE?
Context No.: 76AA-00011 TPQ: 1820
AA1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AB1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED, *
Context No.: 76AA-00012 TPQ: 1864
AA1IRON, NAIL, OVER 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AB2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AC1IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AD7GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
32
AE2GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AG2GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, BROWN
AH6CHARCOAL, CHARCOAL
AI1QUARTZ, STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD
AJ1GLASS, BEAD, BLACK
Context No.: 76AA-00013 TPQ: 1864
AA1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AA1EARTHENWARE, DELFTWARE ENG, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AB2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AC1IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AD2GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AE3GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AF1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AG1STONEWARE, ENGLISH SW, FRAGMENT, LEAD GLAZE, BROWN
AH1PORCELAIN, ENG SOFT PASTE, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, BLUE, POSSIBLY WORCESTER
AI2PORCELAIN, PORCELLANEOUS, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AJ1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, BLUE
AK1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AL1SHELL, SHELL
AM1BONE, BUTTON, ONE PIECE
AN1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, ONE PIECE, WHITE
AO1COPPER ALLOY, HANDLE, LETTERING/NUMB, CHROMED UMBRELLA HANDLE, 'NWR'
Context No.: 76AA-00014 TPQ: 1880
AA2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AB1GLASS, MANG SOLARIZED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AC1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINE BOTTLE
AD1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER
AE1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, BLUE
AF1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
Context No.: 76AA-00015 TPQ: NDA
AA9STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD, UNKNOWN
Context No.: 76AA-00016 TPQ: 1850
AA3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE, *
AB3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AC1IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, CUT
AD3IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AE1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINE BOTTLE
AF8REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AG1REFINED EARTHEN, CREAMWARE, FRAGMENT, MOCHA/DENDRITIC, POLYCHROME
AH1REFINED EARTHEN, CREAMWARE, FRAGMENT, ROYAL PATTERN, RIM
AI2REFINED EARTHEN, CREAMWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
Context No.: 76AA-00017 TPQ: 1880
AA1GLASS, MANG SOLARIZED, FRAGMENT, MULTI-PC MOLD, *
AB1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, MOLD BLOWN
AC3STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD, POSSIBLY QUARTZITE
33
Context No.: 76AA-00018 TPQ: NDA
AB1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, BLUE
Context No.: 76AA-00019 TPQ: NDA
AA18GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
Context No.: 76AA-00020 TPQ: 1864
AA2IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, CUT
AB3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AC3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AD7IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AE1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, TABLE GLASS, *
AF7GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AG3GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, BROWN
AH1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AI1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AJ1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AK1REFINED EARTHEN, CREAMWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AL1PORCELAIN, PORCELLANEOUS, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AM5BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
AN1MORTAR, MORTAR, LIME
AO6IRON, UNID HARDWARE
Context No.: 76AA-00021 TPQ: 1864
AA3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AB1IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, CUT
AC1IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AD1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, MULTI-PC MOLD, GREEN, BASE, LETTERING/NUMB, 'B'
AE8GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AF1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AG1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED FLOW, BLUE
AH5BONE, FRAGMENT
AI1STONE, STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD
Context No.: 76AA-00024 TPQ: 1864
AA2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AB5IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AC1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AD3GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AE7GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AF1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, PHARMACEUTICAL, LETTERING/NUMB, 'SPERM… SEWING'
AG1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLUE
AH1IRON, BUTTON, ONE PIECE, ¾" DIAMETER
Context No.: 76AA-00027 TPQ: 1864
AA1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AB1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, FRAGMENT
AC2GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AD1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, BLUE
AE2REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
34
Context No.: 76AA-00028 TPQ: 1864
AA1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AB1IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, CUT
AC2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AD1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AE2IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AF8GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AG5GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AH1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, AQUA, LETTERING/NUMB, '..N..'
AI2REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AJ1IRON, NUT
Context No.: 76AA-00033 TPQ: 1850
AA2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE, *
AB2REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, POLYCHROME
AC3SHELL, SHELL
AD1BRICK, BRICKETAGE
AE5BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
AF1IRON, UNID HARDWARE
Context No.: 76AA-00034 TPQ: 1864
AA1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, BLUE
AB2GLASS, FRAGMENT, LAMP CHIMNEY
AC1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AD1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, MILK BOTTLE, FINISH
AE1BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
Context No.: 76AA-00035 TPQ: NDA
AA1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, POLYCHROME
AB2STONEWARE, OTHER STONEW, FRAGMENT, LEAD GLAZE
AC6GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AD1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER
AE1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, PHARMACEUTICAL, GREEN
AF2GLASS, CLRLESS LEAD, FRAGMENT, TABLE GLASS
AG3GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AH5GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, TABLE GLASS, NOT LEIGHTON'S PATENT GLASS
AI25GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, NOT LEIGHTON'S PATENT GLASS
AJ11BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
AK1BONE, BUTTON, ONE PIECE
AL1FLORAL, SEED
AM1GLASS, BEAD, BLUE
AN5LEATHER, SHOE, FRAGMENT, INCLUDES A GROMMET
AO1QUARTZ, DEBITAGE, FLAKE FRAG/SHAT, NON-CORTICAL
AP1COPPER ALLOY, RIVET, WITH WASHER
AQ1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AR2IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, WIRE
AS2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AT2IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, CUT
AU2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AV1IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AW7IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AX1IRON, METAL CAP/LID, WITH LEAD SOLDER, TO A CYLINDRICAL CAN
35
AY3IRON, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, TOBACCO CAN FRAGMENTS
AZ1IRON, UNID HARDWARE
BA1IRON, OTHER HARDWARE, SPRING TO A CLOTHESPIN
BB1COPPER ALLOY, RING, CURTAIN
Context No.: 76AA-00036 TPQ: 1880
AA6IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AB1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AC2GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINE BOTTLE
AD1GLASS, MANG SOLARIZED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AE1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AF5GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER
AG3REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AH1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, SPONGED/SPATTER, POLYCHROME, STARS AND GEOMETRIC DESIGN
AI1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLUE
AJ1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, POLYCHROME
AK1PORCELAIN, PORCELLANEOUS, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AL1LEAD ALLOY, UNID HARDWARE
Context No.: 76AA-00037 TPQ: 1880
AA2IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AB2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AC10IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, CUT
AD12IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AE1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AF11IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AG2GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AH9GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER
AI1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, SCREW TOP
AJ2GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AK1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, BROWN
AL1GLASS, MANG SOLARIZED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AM2GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINE BOTTLE
AN9REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED, ONE BURNED
AO1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, OTHER MOLD DEC
AP3REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLUE
AQ1PORCELAIN, PORCELLANEOUS, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AR1STONEWARE, GERMAN STONEW, FRAGMENT
AS5BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
AT1BRICK, BRICKETAGE
AU1PLASTER, PLASTER, LIME
AV2IRON, UNID HARDWARE, ONE HAS 2" DIAMETER
AX1COPPER ALLOY, UNID HARDWARE, PLATED
Context No.: 76AA-00041 TPQ: 1864
AA30BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
AB2IRON, UNID HARDWARE
AC3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AD2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AE8IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AF2REFINED EARTHEN, CREAMWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AG3REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AH1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, SHELL EDGE, BLUE
36
AI1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, MOCHA/DENDRITIC, BLACK
AJ2PORCELAIN, CH PORCELAIN, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, BLUE, CANTON
AK1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AL1STONEWARE, AMER BROWN, FRAGMENT
AM1REFINED EARTHEN, REFINED EW, FRAGMENT, BURNED
AN1GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AO4GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AP2GLASS, CLRLESS LEAD, FRAGMENT, TABLE GLASS
AQ1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AR2GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, NOT LEIGHTON'S PATENT
AS1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, BLUE
AT1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, JAR LID LINER, WHITE
AU1GLASS, BUTTON, ONE PIECE, WHITE
AV1SHELL, BUTTON, ONE PIECE
AW1LEAD, SHOT, SHOT, CUT IN HALF
AX1STONE, STONE, ARCHITECTURAL
AY1IRON, UNID HARDWARE, KEY OR SCISSORS HANDLE
AZ1TIN ALLOY, SPOON, HANDLE
BA1WOOD, BURNED, CHARRED STICK
BB1BURNED CLAY, FRAGMENT
BC2OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, WALNUT
BD18OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, FRAGMENT, WALNUT
BE1OTHER ORGANIC, PUMPKIN OR GOURD STEM
BF21OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PEACH PITS
BG4OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PEANUT SHELLS
BH8OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, UNIDENTIFIED ASSORTMENT
BI2BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
Context No.: 76AA-00042 TPQ: 1864
AA1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, *
AB1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, BLUE
Context No.: 76AA-00043 TPQ: NDA
AB1IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AC3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AD12IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AE2IRON, UNID HARDWARE
AF1IRON, SPOON
AH3WOOD, ORGANIC SUBST, ONE BURNED
AI1REFINED EARTHEN, CREAMWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AJ2REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, BLUE
AK1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AL1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLUE
AM1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, SHELL EDGE, BLUE, *
AN1PORCELAIN, PORCELLANEOUS, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, GREEN
AO1PORCELAIN, PORCELLANEOUS, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AP1PORCELAIN, CH PORCELAIN, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, BLUE
AQ6GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, NOT LEIGHTON PATENT GLASS
AR5GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AS3GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AT1COPPER ALLOY, PIN, STRAIGHT
AU1GLASS, BEAD, CLEAR/UNCOLORED
37
AV1STONE, SLATE PENCIL
AW13PLASTER, PLASTER, LIME, FOUR WITH GREEN PAINT
AY1MINERAL, DAUB
AZ13SHELL, EGGSHELL
BA54BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
BB1OTHER ORGANIC, ORGANIC SUBST, FISH SCALE
BC1LEATHER, ORGANIC SUBST
BD4PAPER, ORGANIC SUBST, NEWSPAPER
BE1CLOTH, ORGANIC SUBST
BF11OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PEACH PITS
BG14OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, WALNUT
BH4OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, ACORN, RODENT CHEWED
BI1OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PECAN, RODENT CHEWED
BJ17OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, GOURD, RODENT CHEWED
BK8OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, UNIDENTIFIED, RODENT CHEWED
Context No.: 76AA-00044 TPQ: 1820
AA1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AB13IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AC1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, BANDED, BROWN
AD1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLUE, *BLUE WILLOW PATTERN
AE1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AF3REFINED EARTHEN, CREAMWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AG1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, WHITE
AH4GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, NOT LEIGHTON'S PATENT
AI1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AJ2GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AK2GLASS, CLRLESS LEAD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER
AL1SHELL, SHELL, MUSSEL
AM1GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT
AN1BONE, BUTTON, ONE PIECE
AO1SHELL, BUTTON, ONE PIECE
AP1GLASS, BEAD, BLUE
AQ4PLASTER, PLASTER, LIME, 2 PAINTED GREEN, 2 PAINTED RED
AS7PLASTER, PLASTER
AT2STONE, STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD
AU4QUARTZ, STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD
AV2IRON, UNID HARDWARE
AW1COPPER ALLOY, UNID HARDWARE
AX1RUBBER, UNIDENTIFIED, POSSIBLEY SHOE HEEL FRAGMENT
AY1LEAD, WINDOW LEAD
AZ2GLASS, BEAD, BLUE, SEED BEAD
BA5SHELL, EGGSHELL
BB4IRON, UNID HARDWARE
BC30BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
BD1OTHER ORGANIC, ORGANIC SUBST, FISHSCALE
BE8PAPER, ORGANIC SUBST, NEWSPAPER
BF2PAPER, ORGANIC SUBST, CARDBOARD
BG1CLOTH, ORGANIC SUBST
BH2OTHER ORGANIC, ORGANIC SUBST, CORN COB
BI8OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, WALNUT
BJ14OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PECANS, RODENT CHEWED
BK4OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PEACH PITS
BL5OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, GOURD LIKE SEEDS, RODENT CHEWED
BM5OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PEANUT SHELLS
BN9OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, UNIDENTIFIED, MANY RODENT CHEWED
BO6OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, ACORNS, ONE RODENT CHEWED
38
Context No.: 76AA-00045 TPQ: NDA
AA12BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
AB1REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLUE
AC1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, GREEN, *
AD1GLASS, BUTTON, WHITE
AE1PLASTIC, BEAD, GREEN
AF1GLASS, CLRLESS LEAD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER
AG1COPPER ALLOY, SHOT, .22 CALIBER SHOT
AH1OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PEACH
AI1OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PECAN
AJ1OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, WALNUT
AK1OTHER STONE, ELEC HARDWARE, GRAPHITE
Context No.: 76AA-00046 TPQ: NDA
AA1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AB35IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AC2IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AD4IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AE3GLASS, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
AF1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN
AG3GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, NOT LEIGHTON PATENT GLASS
AH1STONEWARE, AMER BLUE/GREY, FRAGMENT
AI4PLASTER, PLASTER, LIME, TWO WITH GREEN PAINT
AJ1SHELL, BUTTON, ONE PIECE
AK1PORCELAIN, BUTTON, ONE PIECE, WHITE
AM1COPPER ALLOY, BUTTON, TWO PIECE, PLATED, MILITARY BUTTON WITH EAGLE INSIGNIA
AN1BAKELITE, BUTTON, ONE PIECE, BACK, *
AO1COPPER ALLOY, SHOT, 22 CALIBER SHOT
AP2COPPER ALLOY, UNID HARDWARE
AQ5QUARTZ, STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD
AR1GRANITE, STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD
AS23BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
AT1SHELL, SHELL, SNAIL
AU9SHELL, EGGSHELL
AV1OTHER ORGANIC, FAUNAL SPECIMEN, FISH
AW2OTHER ORGANIC, ORGANIC SUBST, CORN COB
AX8OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, PECAN
AY6OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, WALNUT
AZ1OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, SWEET GUM
BB2OTHER ORGANIC, ORGANIC SUBST, CORN COB
BC3OTHER ORGANIC, SEED, UNIDENTIFIED
Context No.: 76AA-00047 TPQ: NDA
AA7GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CANNING JAR
AB4GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, ONE MARKED 'W-Y'
AC1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, PHARMACEUTICAL, GREEN
AD1GLASS, FRAGMENT, MIRROR
AE1SHELL, SHELL
AF7BONE, FAUNAL SPECIMEN
AG3IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AH1IRON, NAIL, LESS THAN 2 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AI3IRON, NAIL, FRAGMENT
AJ1IRON, NAIL, OVER 4 IN, WIRE
39
AK1GALVANIZED META, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AL1IRON, SPIKE, CUT
AM3REFINED EARTHEN, PEARLWARE, FRAGMENT, SHELL EDGE, BLUE
AN2REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, POLYCHROME, FLORAL DESIGN IN GREEN AND RED
AO1REFINED EARTHEN, IRONST/WH GRAN, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLACK
AP1PORCELAIN, CH PORCELAIN, FRAGMENT, PAINTED UNDER, BLUE
AQ3REFINED EARTHEN, CREAMWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AR2REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, OTHER MOLD DEC
AS17REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AT3REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLUE
AU1STONEWARE, ENGLISH SW, FRAGMENT, GINGER BEER BOTTLE
AV1COARSE EARTHENW, COARSEWARE, FRAGMENT
AW1CERAMIC, TOBACCO PIPE, IMPORTED, STEM
AX1COPPER ALLOY, CLOSURE
AY1PLASTIC, BUTTON, ONE PIECE, BLUE
AZ1PORCELAIN, BUTTON, ONE PIECE, WHITE
BA1PLASTIC, OTHER HARDWARE, BLACK
BB7GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, TABLE GLASS, PRESSED
BC4GLASS, FRAGMENT, LAMP CHIMNEY, CRIMPED RIM
BD1GLASS, MANG SOLARIZED, FRAGMENT, TABLE GLASS
BE4GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, BLUE
BF1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, CONTIN THREAD, BLUE
BG4GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, BEER/POP BOTTLE, GREEN
BH2GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, BEER/POP BOTTLE, CROWN CAP, GREEN
BJ1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CANNING JAR, GREEN
BK1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER, GREEN, MARKED ".TER" "..ORK"
BL1GLASS, MANG SOLARIZED, FRAGMENT, CONTAINER
BM8GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, FRAGMENT, TABLE
BO1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, WINDOW GLASS
BP5GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, WINE BOTTLE, GREEN
BQ1STONE, STONE, NATURAL/UNWRKD, WATERWORN OR ROUNDED
BR1IRON, KNIFE, TABLE
BS19IRON, UNID HARDWARE
BT1IRON, HINGE
BU1IRON, FURNITURE ELE, STOVE LEG
BV1TIN ALLOY, UNID HARDWARE
CC1IRON, LOCK/LOCK PART, LOCK BOLT
CD1IRON, POT, HANDLE, POSSIBLE SPATULA OR FORK
CE1IRON, HANDLE, CAST, TRUNK OR BOX HANDLE
CG1IRON, UNID HARDWARE, CAST
CH1IRON, ESCUTCHEON, CONTAINS A NAIL
Context No.: 76AA-00048 TPQ: NDA
AA1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, SHELL EDGE, BLUE
AB8REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, UNDECORATED
AC1REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, OTHER MOLD DEC
AD4REFINED EARTHEN, WHITEWARE, FRAGMENT, PRINTED UNDER, BLUE, BLUE WILLOW PATTERN
AE1GLASS, COLORED, FRAGMENT, JAR LID LINER, WHITE
AF1COPPER ALLOY, FURNITURE ELE
AG2GLASS, CLRLESS NON-LD, BOTTLE, PHARMACEUTICAL, '30 PHENOLAX WAFERS..'*
AH1SHELL, BUTTON, CLOTHING
AI1IRON, SPOON
40
AJ1IRON, HINGE
AK1IRON, WASHER
AL1IRON, HINGE, STRAP
AM1IRON, CHAIN
AN1IRON, PINTLE
AO1IRON, NAIL, OVER 4 IN, WROUGHT/FORGED
AP1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, CUT
AR1IRON, CASTER, PORCELAIN WHEEL
AS1IRON, HORSESHOE
AT1IRON, SPIKE, OVER 4 IN, CUT
AU2IRON, UNID HARDWARE, POSSIBLE CARRIAGE HARDWARE
AV1IRON, NAIL, 2 TO 4 IN, WIRE
AW1WOOD, ORGANIC SUBST, WORKED, PEG
AX1QUARTZ, BIFACE
AY1IRON, OTHER HARDWARE, WINDOW PULLEY